For most sports it's possible to suggest ways in which the environmental impact could be minimised. For power boating and jet-skiing I think the only thing to do is to give it up.
Here's my 21st way to stuff the planet
Twenty
one Thwack,
Thwack, Thwack it’s a jet-ski
Should
you happen to live near water, you can do your bit for global warming and piss off loads of people trying to enjoy a quiet day out. All you need is a jet-ski.
What’s
the damage?
A
Yamaha jet-ski, at full throttle, burns 58.6 litres of petrol an
hour. At 2.31kg per litre this means 135kg of CO2
an hour.
At £1.30 a litre this’ll cost you £76.18 giving a cost of 56p/kg of
CO2.
This
is about twice the cost of leaving a light bulb on, but at least
twice the fun.
Unfortunately,
jet-skis don’t come cheap. You’d be lucky to rent one for
less than £25 an hour, so this would shove up the total cost to
about £75 which works out at over 75p/kg of CO2
Can
I be arsed?
As
well as the dosh you’d also need to wear a
wet suit. This might be embarrassing if you're the lardier side of manly.
Wind-up-ability
Jet
skis not only make a lot of noise but they make it in places where
boring old farts go to seek peace and quiet.
A
soggy minded American researcher even went so far as to interview
people on the shore and ask them how much they’d be prepared to pay
for the jet-skis to go away. At a popular ocean beach this went as
high as $538 per hour. He estimated the total noise cost to
beachgoers in the USA as $908million per year. Go for it dudes.
As a footnote, one intrepid soul did cross the Atlantic on a jet-ski. He didn't like the noise either and managed to make a quiet one.
Quiet apart from the thwack, thwack, thwack that is.
No comments:
Post a Comment